GBPly - Google Business Profile management software
    For law firms and solicitors

    Law firm profile or individual solicitor profile?

    Google names lawyers as one of its examples of an individual practitioner — a public-facing professional with their own client base. That's the starting point for every firm working out its Business Profile structure, but it doesn't settle the question on its own.

    A firm with one office and one named partner, a firm with twelve solicitors across three practice teams, and a sole solicitor trading under a brand all need different answers. This guide works through the decision firm by firm, not with a single template.

    The decision framework

    Before creating anything, work out which of these shapes actually describes the firm:

    Google guideline
    Google's guidelines name lawyers alongside doctors, dentists, financial planners, and insurance or real estate agents as examples of individual practitioners. Eligibility depends on being public-facing with an identifiable client base, and on being directly contactable at a verified location during stated hours. Support staff — paralegals, legal secretaries, receptionists in a purely administrative role — aren't eligible for their own profile, and there's no basis for a profile per practice area.
    Read Google's guidance

    Naming a solicitor's profile correctly

    The naming pattern follows directly from the structure above:

    • Several solicitors at one firm: each eligible solicitor's profile title is their own name only — not "[Firm] — [Name]" and not a job title.
    • A sole public-facing solicitor under a firm brand: "[Brand]: [Solicitor name]".
    • Never a practice-area suffix on either pattern — no "Family Law — [Name]" or similar.

    Worked example: a mid-sized firm with three teams

    Firm structure and profile eligibility Illustrative example

    Illustrative only — Google decides eligibility and verification case by case.

    • Harrow & Dean Solicitors

      Own profile

      Main category: Law firm

      Practice areas (family, conveyancing, employment) are listed as services and description content, not separate profiles.

      • Priya Anand — public-facing senior solicitor, own client base

        Only if it qualifies

        May have an individual profile named only "Priya Anand", contactable at the firm's office during stated hours.

      • Tom Reyes — associate solicitor, no independent client base

        No separate profile

        Works as part of the team; no separate profile.

      • Reception and paralegal staff

        No separate profile

        Administrative, not public-facing in the practitioner sense.

      • "Family Law Team" as a standalone profile

        No separate profile

        A practice area is not a separate entity — no profile per specialisation.

    Own profileOnly if it meets the rulesPart of the main profile
    Firm-only profile vs. firm plus eligible solicitor profiles
    Firm-only profileFirm + eligible solicitor profiles
    Who it suitsAssociates without an independent client base; firms preferring one point of contactNamed solicitors with their own client base, contactable at the office
    NamingFirm name and categorySolicitor's own name only (or "[Brand]: [Name]" if sole practitioner)
    Practice areasServices and description on the firm profileStill services on the relevant profile — never a profile per area
    Multi-office solicitorsN/AListed only where genuinely contactable during stated hours, not duplicated across every office

    Confidentiality in a public-facing profile

    A law firm or solicitor's profile is a public-facing tool, and everything written on it or in response to it needs to respect the duty of confidentiality that comes before any marketing consideration. A few concrete rules we'd apply:

    • Never confirm a client relationship in a reply. If someone leaves a review implying they instructed the firm, a reply shouldn't confirm or deny that the reviewer was a client, or reference the nature of their matter.
    • No case details, ever, in a public channel. Not the outcome, not the opposing party, not the area of law involved for that specific reviewer, even if the reviewer has already disclosed it themselves.
    • Follow your own regulator's conduct rules. In England and Wales that means the SRA's rules on client confidentiality and publicity; other jurisdictions have their own equivalents (for example, state bar advertising and confidentiality rules in the US). Google's review policy doesn't set out confidentiality wording — that duty sits alongside it, not instead of it.

    A generically safe reply pattern: thank the reviewer for their feedback, avoid any reference to representation or case specifics, and invite them to get in touch directly if they have a concern. For example: "Thank you for taking the time to leave feedback. If you'd like to discuss anything further, please contact our office directly." That wording confirms nothing about whether the reviewer was ever a client.

    Google guideline
    Google's review policy prohibits incentivised reviews and reviews written by employees or owners of the business being reviewed. It has nothing to say about client confidentiality — that's a professional and regulatory obligation that firms carry independently of Google's rules.
    Read Google's guidance

    Genuine out-of-hours assistance, not a misleading '24-hour' claim

    Some firms, particularly in areas like criminal defence or urgent injunctions, offer a genuine out-of-hours contact line. If that's real — a number that's actually staffed or forwarded to someone who will respond — it can be described accurately as out-of-hours or emergency contact availability.

    What doesn't hold up is marking a profile as open 24 hours when the office itself isn't staffed and reachable around the clock. Google's hours should reflect when the business is genuinely open and contactable; a voicemail that nobody checks until 9am isn't a basis for a 24-hour listing.

    How GBPly fits a law firm or solicitor

    AI-drafted review replies, human-approved

    Drafts a reply that avoids confirming any client relationship or case detail; a team member checks and sends it.

    Profile Guard across firm and solicitor profiles

    Flags unexpected changes to hours, category or contact details on any of the firm's profiles.

    Multi-office consistency

    Keeps hours, categories and contact details aligned across offices where a firm has more than one location.

    GBPly works with profiles you already manage. It does not create, verify or decide eligibility for Business Profiles; Google does.

    Law firm and solicitor profile questions

    Can every solicitor at a firm have their own profile?
    Only those who are genuinely public-facing with their own identifiable client base and who are directly contactable at the office during stated hours. Associates without an independent client base, and administrative staff, generally aren't eligible.
    Can we create a profile for each practice area?
    No. Google doesn't allow multiple profiles to cover different specialisations of the same practitioner or firm. Practice areas belong on the firm or solicitor's one profile as services and description content.
    What should a solicitor's own profile be named?
    Their own name only, unless they're the sole public-facing practitioner under a firm brand, in which case the pattern is "[Brand]: [Name]".
    Can a review reply confirm someone was a client?
    We'd avoid it. Confirming a client relationship or case detail in a public reply isn't something Google requires or prohibits specifically, but it risks breaching professional confidentiality duties that sit outside Google's review policy entirely.
    Can we list the firm as open 24 hours if there's an emergency line?
    Only describe hours and out-of-hours availability accurately. If the office isn't staffed and genuinely contactable around the clock, a 24-hour listing is misleading, even where a real emergency contact line exists.

    Sources and guidance

    Statements tagged Google guideline paraphrase Google's own help pages below. Statements tagged GBPly recommendation are GBPly's editorial opinion, and Illustrative example scenarios describe hypothetical businesses. Google's guidelines change; check the live pages before acting.

    Guidance checked against Google's help pages on 12 October 2026.

    Get your firm's profile structure right, once

    GBPly drafts confidentiality-safe review replies for your team to check, watches every profile for unexpected changes, and keeps multi-office firms consistent.

    Rated 4.9 out of 5 from 37 GBPly customers.Read customer stories